• Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • FMTV on YouTube
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Bluesky
    • Linktree
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

Flickering Myth

Geek Culture | Movies, TV, Comic Books & Video Games

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles & Opinions
  • The Baby in the Basket
  • Death Among the Pines

Outside the Wire – Why Captain Leo’s Motivations Don’t Make Sense

January 23, 2021 by admin

Lauren Miles on Netflix’s Outside the Wire (warning: spoilers follow)…

Outside the Wire, Netflix’s new sci-fi action film starring Anthony Mackie, portrays a near future where wars are fought with both human soldiers and robots. The year is 2036 and a civil war has broken out in Ukraine, with the USA caught between the two factions and ostensibly acting as a peace-keeping force. However, everything is not as it seems. The films protagonist, Lieutenant Harp (Damson Idris), is a drone pilot who disobeys orders and kills two US soldiers in a drone strike. As punishment for his actions, he is sent to a military base and assigned to Captain Leo (Mackie). Harp is surprised to discover that Leo is an android, and even more surprised when he is commanded to follow the Captain into the demilitarised zone to kill a warlord and recover dangerous nuclear weapons.

Initially, Harp’s attitude towards collateral damage is that it is a necessity. When trying to save the majority, there are bound to be casualties. This is reflected in the US army’s attitudes towards civilians in the demilitarised zone. It becomes clear very early on that neither the army or the insurrectionists care about the loss of innocent lives, and this is a theme that Outside the Wire deals with heavily. Harp’s whole character arc is centred on his changing opinions of war. He learns, with Leo’s help, to value individual lives. Harp’s change of heart is very important to the films’ ending; his newfound conscience steels his resolve and makes him willing to sacrifice himself to stop Leo from attacking the US.

The final act kicks off with Harp realising that he has been tricked by Leo into removing his fail-safe device, allowing him to go rogue. Instead of taking the nuclear weapons for the US, the android instead tries to use the bomb against them. His reasoning for turning on his creators is that he believes them to be the aggressors, instigating more fighting through their creation of robotic soldiers like himself. However, the biggest flaw in his plan is that his attack would kill many more innocent people, and this is completely at odds with his characterisation throughout the rest of the film.

Leo might be an android without any real emotions, but he clearly has some understanding of right and wrong. He recognises that the way the US military treats the people in the demilitarised zone is immoral, and this comes across almost immediately in the difference in the way he treats them. Soon after he and Harp cross into their territory, there is a stand-off between some armed civilians and US troops. Both the robots and human soldiers raise their weapons, but Leo walks unarmed and unafraid towards them, ready to talk it out and shake hands. He is a far better peacekeeper than the human characters, and this shows that he is capable of understanding the difficult position that they have been placed in because of the civil war. When Harp accuses them of being violent, Leo explains to him that they only act that way because they live in poverty with little access to food or medicine.

His compassionate side also comes out when visiting the orphanage. Granted, he visits to get information from a leader of the resistance, but Leo also seems genuinely supportive of their cause. The fact that he wants to carry out an attack on the US also indicates that he wants to retaliate against them in a way that will make them realise the human cost of war, and experience the loss that they have inflicted on others. In short, Leo is the only character who understands from the beginning that the amount of civilian casualties the US is creating is morally wrong.

This is why his plan to use the nukes against the US makes no sense. Admittedly, he is stuck between a rock and a hard place. He wants to attack his creators to make them stop inciting violence and creating android soldiers, but this comes at the cost of many innocent lives. Taking into account his behaviour throughout the film, it seems highly unlikely that he would plan to do this. If it’s vengeance that he wants, or to send a warning to the US, then it would have been a better idea to attack the US military base that he was stationed at. That way, he would be punishing his creators as well as targeting the people who were actually responsible for the destruction and violence plaguing Ukraine.

Outside the Wire is a fun, action-packed film, with an exceptional performance from Anthony Mackie. However, it is let down by its final act and the out-of-character decisions made by Captain Leo. His choice to attack the US ultimately undermines his previous actions to protect civilians and sinks his character to the same level as the military and the terrorists.

Outside the Wire is streaming now on Netflix.

 

Filed Under: Articles and Opinions, Lauren Miles, Movies Tagged With: Anthony Mackie, netflix, Outside the Wire

WATCH OUR NEW FILM FOR FREE ON TUBI

FMTV – Watch Our Latest Video Here

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

Ten Essential British Horror Movies You Need To See

6 Great Rutger Hauer Sci-Fi Films That Aren’t Blade Runner

10 More International Horror Movies You Need to See

Friday the 13th at 45: The Story Behind the Classic Slasher

8 Must-See 90s Neo-Noir Movies You Might Have Missed

The Return of Cameron Diaz: Her Best Movies Worth Revisiting

7 Great Dystopian Thrillers of the 1970s

1990s Summer Movie Flops That Deserved Better

2025 in Film: What Did We Learn?

Philip K. Dick & Hollywood: The Essential Movie Adaptations

Top Stories:

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice at 10 – Looking Back at Zack Snyder’s Polarizing Superhero Flick

4K Ultra HD Review – Vampyros Lesbos (1971)

12 Essential Marchal Arts Movies To Enjoy This March

What to Expect From A24’s Bloodsport Remake

Movie Review – Project Hail Mary (2026)

Movie Review – Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man (2026)

Movie Review – The Caretaker (2026)

Movie Review – Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (2026)

Movie Review – Tow (2026)

The Essential Bruce Campbell Movies

FLICKERING MYTH FILMS

 

FEATURED POSTS:

Out for Vengeance: Ten Essential Revenge Movies

10 Stunning Performances Outrageously Snubbed by the Oscars

10 Great Movies You Can Only Watch Once

10 Cult 70s Horror Gems You May Have Missed

  • Pop Culture
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Comic Books
    • Video Games
    • Toys & Collectibles
  • Features
    • News
    • Reviews
    • Articles and Opinions
    • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • FMTV on YouTube
  • About
    • About Flickering Myth
    • Write for Flickering Myth
    • Advertise on Flickering Myth
  • Socials
    • Facebook
    • X
    • Instagram
    • Flipboard
    • Bluesky
    • Linktree
  • Terms
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

© Flickering Myth Limited. All rights reserved. The reproduction, modification, distribution, or republication of the content without permission is strictly prohibited. Movie titles, images, etc. are registered trademarks / copyright their respective rights holders. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. If you can read this, you don't need glasses.


 

Flickering MythLogo Header Menu
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Articles and Opinions
  • The Baby in the Basket
  • Death Among the Pines
  • About Flickering Myth
  • Write for Flickering Myth